Discussion

What are your thoughts? Do you think we need new laws to protect our mental privacy? Do you think thought police is coming soon? Do you have any suggestions? Leave a message and share with others.

Number of comments: 5

5 Comments on “Discussion”

  • Amy

    says:

    The beginning of the end …

    Reply

  • Evelyn Dench

    says:

    I think this is a great initiative, to let everyone know exactly what’s going on.
    I have been twice, the first time happened in Spain in 2010, the targeting lasted a couple of days, after leaving Spain ( after about two weeks) to get back to England as I thought I was being followed, all.my symptoms dissapeared pretty much after hours.
    The second time I was targeted in the UK. Ever since I have been suffering the effects of all these weapons. My Neurostrike symptoms are quite bad right now, since I moved to Bromley in Kent,my situation has worsened considerably. I.am warning everyone to avoid this area.
    You will find more information about my campaign and myself, a victim of Mind Control Technology in YouTube, Substack.com and Twitter @Evelyn_Dench

    Reply

  • Anna Poggesi

    says:

    Constato che e’ la mafia che utilizza ogni sorta di tecnologia da remoto per impossessarsi di beni altrui mobili e immobili . E per non fare capire questo , inserisce nelle persecuzioni anche tantissime altre persone povere , affinche’ si pensi che si stanno facendo esperimenti .
    Gli esperimenti di cui si parla , suppongo quindi che siano solo coperture per reati di criminalita’ organizzata e mafia .(assassinii compresi).

    Reply

  • Anna Poggesi

    says:

    In genere viene scartato da ogni pubblicazione tutto cio’ che scrivo io .Ma occorre che siano instituito ambienti dove potersi rivolgere per far verificare gli accadimenti lamentati

    Reply

  • ourconstitution.info

    says:

    Thanks so much Peter for all your important efforts. Someone on X just shared your report on the gangstalking defs. I have always had a problem with wikipedia’s – not sure why someone more knowledgeable than me doesn’t “update” that page??? (Please do!!!) Also. please try to be active on X… I see your account…

    PPS: Nita Farahany was on the 2011 Presidential Bioethics Commission that did NOT A THING – none of them – she specifically dismisses TIs – It’s is really strange – she acknowledges the tech, but not use against TIs. Likely controlled opposition. Can’t believe she’s an ethics + attorney. Please do NOT promote her – but tell the truth about her bias for this tech and against TIs. I can send you some posts on this. I am @ProtectPatient1 – please @ me and I will link these posts.

    Reply

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Note(s):

  • This site is protected by reCAPTCHA v2 and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

  • Disable your ad blocker if the reCAPTCHA image is not shown.
To top